Don’t agree with Abercrombie’s values? Get over it.

Years and years ago, Abercrombie CEO Mike Jeffries spoke to Salon magazine about his company’s brand:

“In every school there are the cool and popular kids, and then there are the not-so-cool kids,” he says. “Candidly, we go after the cool kids. We go after the attractive all-American kid with a great attitude and a lot of friends. A lot of people don’t belong [in our clothes], and they can’t belong. Are we exclusionary? Absolutely.”

This has made some people very angry.

“I hate Abercrombie and would never wear their stuff, but they should still make clothing for me.” — some people right now.

“I don’t like how Mike Jeffries criticizes people for how they look, so I’m going to criticize him for how he looks.” — more people right now.

If Abercrombie doesn’t make clothing that fits you, then don’t buy it. If your concern is that no popular brands make clothing that fits you or with the image that brands like Abercrombie perpetuate, then your problem is not with Abercrombie but with the culture that contains Abercrombie.

Physical appearance is a touchy issue

People are angry with Mike Jeffries because they believe it is wrong to sell to people based largely on how attractive they are—and people are certainly entitled to feeling that way. But I find it hard to argue that it is an immoral or even wrong way to segment a crowded market.

But for some reason, image and appearance are touchy issues; it makes people feel more uncomfortable and more insecure than other forms of discrimination, perhaps because they haven’t accepted that the world doesn’t quite work the way that they have inexplicably determined that it should.

Abercrombie electrified the dissonance some people feel between what they believe is fair and what is fact, with who they are and who they want to be, with who they can be and who they will never be. So while you can argue that it is insensitive of Mike Jeffries to make a spectacle of this old-as-time divide between the haves and the have-nots, there is no place to assert moral superiority over a man just because he is trying to do the same thing to others.

Abercrombie’s critics are too riled up to act sensibly

Abercrombie is a powerful brand that has connected emotionally with people and galvanized its harshest critics to do good for humanity by driving them to donate Abercrombie clothing to the homeless. While it’s great that this situation puts attention on homelessness in a country of increasingly unequal socioeconomic conditions, it’s worth noting that the campaign’s goal is not to clothe the homeless.

The campaign instead aims “to make Abercrombie & Fitch the world’s number one brand of homeless apparel.” That’s right. The sole objective is to tarnish the Abercrombie brand by clothing the homeless in it. The homeless are but a pawn in this game, a means to an end. These critics find the Abercrombie brand so heinous, so morally wrong, that they want to dress and brand the country’s least fortunate people in their clothing to prove a point that was never all that solid to begin with.

Abercrombie may be a controversial brand, but it’s not an immoral one. This campaign to “rebrand Abercrombie” reeks of hot-headed rage. Its desire to destroy the brand under the guise of philanthropy feels much more malicious than Abercrombie’s choosing to cater to a specific consumer segment. These people don’t care about the homeless— at least not until Abercrombie expressed disdain toward them. They only care to see Abercrombie burn.

Remembering Chick-fil-A

This isn’t the first time a major brand has come under attack for its values. Chick-fil-A experienced an almost identical backlash when their stance on LGBT rights—and donations to opposing causes—was publicized in late 2012. This drove gay rights supporters through the roof, leading some to organize a “kiss in” at Chick-fil-A outlets nationwide to protest.

The goal of that campaign was nebulous at best, but the strategy was to drive gay people to Chick-fil-A restaurants to make out in their dining rooms. I’m still unclear as to what that was supposed to accomplish. At most, I can see it making some people very angry and uncomfortable, which will in turn would cause them to act out with the same senselessness as their opposition.

Nothing good comes from this; nothing good comes from losing your cool. That is what happened when Chick-fil-A ignited passions, and it’s exactly what’s happening right now with Mike Jeffries and Abercrombie.

What it means for marketing

I really appreciate what Erika Napoletano has to say about unpopularity—especially when it comes to brands. “The world needs more brands like Chick-fil-A,” she has said in her TED Talk about rethinking unpopular (which I highly highly recommend everyone check out). And she’s right. The world needs more brands with values, whether you agree with them or not. To each his own—there’s plenty to go around.

Some love for Kmart’s “Ship My Pants” commercial.

Video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=I03UmJbK0lA

I love when a brand finds a way to communicate a distinguishing marketing message with a clever sense of humor. This ad is not only memorable but also effective: remembering the joke (and, really, who won’t remember it?) means remembering the message. And based on feedback I’m seeing in the social space, it looks like the ad also has pretty great brand recognition. Brands can do so much more than sell a product if they’re willing to take a risk. Well done, Kmart.

What The Sims can teach brands about social media.

Image

Before we had Twitter and Facebook to keep us busy, we Millennials had The Sims. We spent hours building fake houses for the fake families whose lives we controlled—and sometimes destroyed—and we were constantly entertained by what this early-2000s computer game thought of how people interact.

Relationships in The Sims were basic and formulaic, following very precise logic. There were no two Sims who couldn’t be friends and it was never too late to start over with a wife you cheated on just hours ago.

Image

The Sims logic

But even if relationships in The Sims were more for novelty and entertainment than anything else, there are quite a few true-to-life social media lessons brands could learn from The Sims.

1. You have to do it.

There’s no way around it. As social animals we have to form relationships with other people. If you deprived your poor Sim of human interaction, they would cry in the corner or refuse to do what you told them because they were quite literally paralyzed by loneliness.

Don’t think your brand is any different, don’t ever think you’re above building relationships with people. Just because you have a logo doesn’t mean you have the right to hide behind it on social networks. If real, true connections are an afterthought, your brand could meet the same, bleak fate as this unfortunate Sim.

Image

2. The number of friends you have matters.

In The Sims players could be rewarded with job promotions if they had a certain number of friends. Beyond the highly basic game logic, there’s a lesson here: relationships pay off. Sure, you can have one (or even a few) great friendship, but let’s face it, when you’re talking social media, you’re talking networking, you’re talking connections. You’re talking about quantity.

The power of social media is in its reach and scale. This doesn’t mean you have to be mainstream, but you have to at least own a niche! Of course, you want strong relationships, but you want enough of them, too. Numbers matter, people. They aren’t everything, but they do make a difference.

3. Quality matters too, so do it often and do it consistently.

In The Sims it was almost impossible to maintain quality relationships with enough people to keep your brand-new job. By the time you called up your neighbor and waited the inexplicable 3 hours for them to arrive at your door, your Sim was complaining about being hungry or in serious need of some sleep before the carpool arrived for work. If they went a few days without talking, their friendship status was in danger of dropping to the “who are you?” level. It was hard work to make and keep friends, but when you made it a priority for your Sim, they were happier and better off for it.

Brands aren’t done when they get someone to “like” their page, and they’re not doing much in the way of “maintaining” a relationship when they’re just blasting senseless updates at people. Quality relationships involve hard work and serious commitment. You can’t just talk about anything, you have to talk about what matters or your relationship progress bar is going to stay flat.

Image

4. The phone’s great and all, but it’s no substitute for face-to-face communication.

The Sims offered two ways to communicate with others: over the phone or in person. Pretty simple world, right? Unsurprisingly, phone conversations didn’t give many interaction options, and barely added any friendship points to a relationship. Face-to-face talk was where it was at. In person, you could not only chat, but you could hug or flirt or joke or, hey, make out.

Image

The lesson? In-person brand experiences are best, but technology and social media can help cover your bases between in-person brand experiences, such as when someone is buying or using your product.

Brands have all these different forms of social media at their disposal to give them more moments and methods to connect with people. Every channel, every network, every community offers different ways to connect and new people to connect with. Not all kinds of content work on every social network, not all content works the same way, and not everyone in one community is the same as those in a different community.

Brands don’t need to be on every channel, and they don’t need to be the same on every channel. They just need to be relevant to wherever they’re participating and consider the context of their relationship levels with others there.

5. Think about what you’re saying or you’ll get slapped.

Don’t talk to everyone the same. Your Sim wife would get pissed when you didn’t reciprocate the affection she needed. Your Sim neighbor would slap you when you flirted with her before greeting her first. So why do brands try to sell to people who they haven’t even done the equivalent of exchanging pleasantries first?

Build a relationship, but don’t force one. Brand interactions have steps and levels to them just like Sim relationships—and real-life relationships! Treating everyone the same just doesn’t work at a certain point. Adapt and find how you fit in, or I guarantee you will get slapped.

Image